Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umcb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 05:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Umcb[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDICT, WP:NOTNEO, no evidence that this abbreviation even exists in the wild. Prod removed by article creator without explanation. Kolbasz (talk) 12:50, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Kolbasz (talk) 12:52, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:36, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NAD and WP:NEO. At best this a WP:TNT scenario, with only a WP:DICDEF and a FaceBook citation. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ... not reliably verifiable, to start. And then... --j⚛e decker ^talk 04:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.