Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultra Cricket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 05:09, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ultra Cricket

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about an apparently non-notable website that no longer exists. Only external link is to a holding page, and a Google search reveals little of value. Harrias ^talk 09:39, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Unreferenced and the website no longer even exists. Fails WP:WEB. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 09:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unreferenced, even when the site was active, I doubt it would meet WP:GNG. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 12:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Non-notable website. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 17:26, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – per The Anonymouse. Zia Khan 18:21, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources or general assertion to notability on an encyclopedic level. As such does not meet WP:COMPANY and WP:WEB. Mkdw ^talk 20:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.