Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimateeconomics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. JIP | Talk 06:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable neologism, seems to be created by the author. Contested prod. Amarkov babble 00:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, nonsense, NN, Neo, OR --Steve 01:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. This article is complete nonsense, if not a hoax. [Iridescence] talk • contrib 01:05, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note article's creator has also started Ultimateeconomic --Steve 02:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Without hesitation. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 02:18, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete WP:SNOW.--Húsönd 02:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete --Stenun 03:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, again [1], as nonsense. --Calton | Talk 04:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this and Ultimateeconomic as above. Robovski 04:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedydelete as utternonsense. I'll add thetag and stop trying to badlycompound my verbiage. =) --Dennisthe2 04:43, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per above.Xeinart 05:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.