Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulla Strömstedt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:09, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ulla Strömstedt[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources. — Jeff G. ツ 02:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 02:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 02:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep does not pass WP:NACTOR in her US roles but may do in the Swedish roles such as [this] film where she is second in the credits, she also has a supporting role in Catalina Caper. Also I can't work out what the article refers to when she was elected in Stockholm, if it was political or not, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 02:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I found some in-depth write-ups about the subject in a couple of books: 1 at page 319, and 2 at page 316. (Although WP:NACTOR wasn't invoked, I think the subject's roles in Catalina Caper and Flipper (1964 TV series) meet criterion 1.) Dflaw4 (talk) 11:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:GNG.BabbaQ (talk) 15:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In addition to the sources cited above, she got a good amount of newspaper coverage in the US from 1965-1967. Here are three examples from Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, and San Francisco Examiner. 1, 2, 3. I think she meets GNG and maybe narrowly WP:NACTOR as well. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 22:31, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.