Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uhtred of Bebbanburg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirects may be added at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:45, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uhtred of Bebbanburg[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability shown, in-universe trivia; not a single source; tag unresolved for months. Alt. merge any relevant detail to The Saxon Stories and The Last Kingdom (TV series) respectively. CapnZapp (talk) 17:34, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Saxon Stories for now A character list would be very useful here, as this character is not independently notable. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 23:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Why The Saxon Stories and not The Last Kingdom (TV series)? (Not disagreeing, just curious) CapnZapp (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect. No sources, pure PLOT summary, possible OR. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:31, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per WP:ALLPLOT, zero sources.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:00, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 17:24, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.