Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uglydolls (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Uglydoll#Proposed television series without prejudice against a selective merger. Owen× ☎ 21:16, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uglydolls (TV series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent reliable sources confirm that there will be an upcoming TV series with this title. This is a hoax. GTrang (talk) 18:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Comics and animation. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:35, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Uglydoll: or UglyDolls. This is a 2019 project that crashed but it received a lot of coverage, which includes https://www.cartoonbrew.com/box-office-report/stx-wanted-uglydolls-to-be-a-franchise-instead-they-got-a-flop-173711.html https://www.cartoonbrew.com/box-office-report/stx-wanted-uglydolls-to-be-a-franchise-instead-they-got-a-flop-173711.html https://variety.com/2019/film/news/china-alibaba-stxs-uglydoll-franchise-1203105602/ https://www.thewrap.com/stx-entertainment-inks-partnership-with-alibaba-to-produce-finance-more-uglydolls/ etc etc. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the best target is: Uglydoll#Proposed_television_series. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as it's not independently notable. Could merge but there's nothing really to merge that isn't at the target of Uglydoll#Proposed television series. (I guess describing it as an "upcoming" series is maybe hoaxy but also could be a good faith misunderstanding of when the story was from. Skynxnex (talk) 21:37, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.