Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UbiQ

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UbiQ

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I dePRODed this while clearing expired PRODs. Concern was: Spam, but I think a review by the community would be more appropria.te Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 11:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 09:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:11, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:CSD#A7 applies: no claim to notability of the company, only describing its products (in a somewhat promotional way). QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no coverage anywhere in independent sources Kraxler (talk) 18:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.