Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US Senators Average Tenure Increasing
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Original research; non-notable; unverifiable; etc. seicer | talk | contribs 15:22, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- US Senators Average Tenure Increasing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Pure WP:OR-- Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's not just original research, it's grossly wrong in so many areas it should have been Speedied as vandalism. Edward321 (talk) 23:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment I'm not competent to judge its correctness, so I gave it the benefit of the doubt and brought it here. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The article claims the US Senate has been around for 2030 years. Edward321 (talk) 06:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- cmt that is probably their combined age. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 08:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The article claims the US Senate has been around for 2030 years. Edward321 (talk) 06:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment I'm not competent to judge its correctness, so I gave it the benefit of the doubt and brought it here. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 23:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I don't think it's vandalism, but it is an original research essay, not an encyclopedia article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete. Original research, fails WP:N, WP:V, borderline qualifies for speedy under patent nonsense.Horrorshowj (talk) 09:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as unsourced essay in violation of WP:NOR. 23skidoo (talk) 15:27, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.