Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS APL-29

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 09:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

USS APL-29[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another one of these non notable ships, sourced to fan sites and with "awards" which were given out by the millions. Nothing better could be found online[1], so I nominated it for prod deletion, but for some reason this was reverted as "too soon", which is not really a helpful reason (the ship won't suddenly become notable in the next few days, and the article creator already moved on to other articles). Fram (talk) 09:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BASIC. Perhaps a list of APL-17 class Barracks Ships may be worthwhile. Mztourist (talk) 10:38, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete although creating a list of such ships seems like a good idea. Oaktree b (talk) 23:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. -Ljleppan (talk) 10:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.