Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USAFA Class exemplar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After two full relistings, no specific consensus for a particular outcome or action has emerged. Perhaps further discussion on the article's talk page would be beneficial. North America1000 08:24, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

USAFA Class exemplar[edit]

USAFA Class exemplar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No in-depth coverage in independent reliable sources. --Pontificalibus 08:16, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 13:14, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 13:14, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. In its current form it isn’t supported by independent sources that indicate notability. Garuda28 (talk) 13:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep added multiple independent sources that support notability Keeper5689 21:08, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Having had a chance to review the additions, the article still appears to fail WP:GNG. Would reccomend merging content into the United States Air Force Academy article. Garuda28 (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:56, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Both of those are about whether specific people should be included within a list, and don't address the notability of this topic.----Pontificalibus 08:52, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:15, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.