Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UEIMS School of Medicine & Dentistry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 07:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UEIMS School of Medicine & Dentistry

Contested PROD article originally flagged for rescue - Pure advertising page which might be saved trough some copy editing. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 09:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - schools of medicine are always notable. Sure, this is a terrible article but AfD is not a cleanup squad; this should have been tagged for improvement. TerriersFan (talk) 16:45, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A case for cleanup, not for deletion. There can always be an article on a medical or dental school. Maybe we need to divide AfD into two tracks: one for inadequate articles that need to be called to general attention for improvement, with deletion a possibility in the background if they cannot be improved, and a second one for things that should actually be deleted. DGG (talk) 05:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but this may be a sign of a bigger issue. We've had a few Indian? or Middle East writers profer these poorly written bits. I wonder if it makes sense to invoke a first build it your language wiki approach? They might have already but how much energy can we put towards this? Alternatively I wonder if we have or should create a English-as-a-second-language tag directing those interested towards translating services. It's quite frustrating to fully clean these up only to have deleted because sourcing was simply not available. -- Banjeboi 12:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.