Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UCW-Zero Tag Team Championship
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. Sr13 06:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- UCW-Zero Tag Team Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable championship for a minor non-notable wrestling promotion, fails WP:V which is why the content was removed and fails WP:N, claims of being a member of the NWA is in itself not enough to warrant notability as even the smallest indy fed can pay the dues and call themselves an "NWA" federation, there has to be more to it than just paying the NWA due to achieve notability for the promotion. If Prod is removed without sources being provided it will go straight to AFD. Andrew_pmk | Talk 15:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because they suffere from the same problems as the UCW-Zero Tag Team Championship article and all pertain to articles about the same federation maintained by the same user:MPJ-DK 15:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- UCW-Zero Mexico Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- UCW-Zero Heavyweight Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- UCW-Zero Ultra-X Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
note: the bundle was added after user Coren voted just so there is no misunderstanding MPJ-DK 15:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete The federation has no inclusion requirement beyond paying the dues, and the championship has no notability of its own. Coren 15:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I keep my !vote for the whole bundle, for the same reasons. Coren 18:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As the original prodder I vote delete does not in any way show notability, did not even attempt to show notability or verifiability when removing the prods MPJ-DK 15:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete All, all fail WP:N. Bmg916Speak 16:10, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete All BMG said it best. This kind of stuff gives the project a bad name. Darrenhusted 16:40, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all, not notable in any way. Nikki311 23:20, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.