Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U.S. Rail News

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Rail News

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable defunct newsletter service. TheGGoose (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:25, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:26, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, would G11 if not for age. ("essential reading", "thorough reporting") – Train2104 (t • c) 22:53, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:55, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Dull page with no information Jkd4855 (talk) 02:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article is nothing but a lot of vague statements about the purported importance of this newsletter, with nothing substantiated by reliable sources. --Kinu ^t/_c 02:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.