Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U-BORA Towers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: Speedily deleted all contributions by users User:Aedas and/or User:Redbean1027 as blatant self-promotion and possible copyright violation (articles may not be actually GFDL-licensed), with the exception of articles that had existed before the users' edits (Prince's Building, Pentominium, The Marina Bay Sands, Ocean Heights (Dubai), West Kowloon Cultural District); they were reverted to the previous versions. - Mike Rosoft 16:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

U-BORA Towers

Clear advertising for a commercial real estate project under construction. Notability not asserted. I tried to db-spam it but someone keeps deleting the tag. Dougie WII 14:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pretty obvious advertising / promotion. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 15:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It might be an ad, but either way it doesn't appear to be a notable project.Alberon 15:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteBlatant advertising, the images look swiped from somewhere as well Г^edʃtǁcɭ 15:26, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this and all associated articles. Some of these buildings may very well be notable, but the case for this is not made. Clear COI violation on all articles. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 15:31, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clear case of advertising spam Mayalld 15:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 15:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are also advertising for building projects by same firm. Appears to be made by same user under different name after original name was blocked.

-- Dougie WII 15:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And some more:

-- Dougie WII 15:49, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam. Delete, candidates for speedy deletion. Marking as such. - Mike Rosoft 15:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- In addition, I have made a simple Google search, and the article U-BORA Towers indeed comes from the www.aedas.com website. - Mike Rosoft 16:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.