Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyson-Lord Gray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 00:51, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tyson-Lord Gray[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a fluff piece written by an SPA with no in-depth coverage of the subject. There are passing mentions and some brief local coverage but nothing substantial. Fails GNG and serves as little more than a promotional write up. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:59, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How is this a fluff piece? There are nearly 30 citations and the person already has a page on Ballotpedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.203.14.168 (talk) 18:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:03, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:03, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:32, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:32, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:32, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is almost a speedy as there is no claim to notability. How is the subject to be thought of as notable? Certainly not as an author or politician. And despite the long list of citations, it fails WP:GNG as well. St Anselm (talk) 04:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The minor awards and publications listed in the article may be enough to save this from an A7 speedy deletion, but they don't rise to the level of notability and there seems to be nothing else. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.