Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Luellen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per consensus. I have no issue with Mr. Luellen's article getting renominated if in fact he, as a signed free agent, never in fact makes it off practic squad for the Chargers. But that's for later. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 20:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tyler Luellen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
UnsignedUndrafted free-agent NFL rookie, non-notable college career. Speedy was declined. I've speedy-tagged several other similar articles by the same author that were deleted by other admins. --Finngall talk 01:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not a notable sports player. I can understand why the speedy was declined, but there's nothing here to justify keeping it. Terraxos (talk) 01:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are plenty of news stories on this guy. Notability may be marginal, but he's on the right side of the margin. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:07, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep seems rather notable to me Ijanderson977 (talk) 21:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 01:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - NFL players are inherently notable. He is undrafted, not unsigned, by the way. --B (talk) 01:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is he really an NFL player if he gets cut before playing a regular-season game? Are you really saying that every warm body a team brings in to training camp merits an article? --Finngall talk 03:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.