Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Brown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tyler Brown

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Listing per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 February 16. I abstain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:52, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no secondary sources that aren't routine reporting. CrazyPaco (talk) 09:25, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Played two years at a community college, is now in first year at Illinois State. He does seem to be one of the better players on the team, but this is a team that hasn't been invited to the NCAA tournament for 14 years and has had a poor season even by their standards. Of the article's refs, the first is a directory listing and the second is primary (from his college). In the last, he is the focus of an upcoming game preview in a local paper. It helps the case a bit, but is nowhere near enough, and other web search results look trivial/routine. Substantial coverage from WP:RS sources is lacking, and there's no reason to expect such coverage. Fails WP:GNG. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 16:26, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I suppose I can !vote here, having been the one who deleted it in the first place. Hobbes Goodyear says it better than I could... Peridon (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.