Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two point acupressure
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Two point acupressure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I am also nominating the following related pages because it is the same content:
- Collateral meridian therapy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
While there are 3 sources listed as references, when looking only 1 actually describes either Two point acupressure or Collateral meridian therapy. 1 doesn't exist, and the other is a list of "related articles". Related to what is not certain, but not these articles. Upon searching, the only source I could find was the working link, and that is a letter to the editor of a journal. These pages describe a non-notable technique that has not been the subject of independent coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. Atmoz (talk) 03:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete People start these offshoot schools all the time, and the vast majority of them never receive independent in-depth coverage. This appears to be one such. - 2/0 (formerly Eldereft) (cont.) 15:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:48, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete only one Google Scholar hit. Would be a single-source article. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 11:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.