Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Brothers Brewing (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Bad faith nom by block-evading sock. Tim Song (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two Brothers Brewing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The reason why this article needs to be deleted is an unpaid advertisement for Two Brothers, see WP:NOTADVERTISING as well as Wikipedia policy of Notability WP:NOTE. This article violates WP:PROMOTION , WP:NOTDIRECTORY and wikipeidia is not a webblog for advertising or promotion of a commercial enterprise. This article should be deleted for the reasons stated. Beer and wine (talk) 09:45, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep You may believe the article needs to be re-written, but you should not delete a WP:N subject because it is not written with correct stylistic form.— Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 00:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. "It's poorly written" is an argument to avoid- it's a reason to improve, not to delete. tedder (talk) 21:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and send nominator to detention. See my discussion on the talk page I had with him before he inevitably moved to do this again: Talk:Two_Brothers_Brewing#Does_Wikipedia_get_paid_for_this_beer_advertisement.3F. Recommend speedy close as the nomination is in bad faith, and two AfDs in the last 9 months resulted in keeps where nominator barely made any headway. Perhaps article could be toned down a bit, but that's not an argument for deletion here, and nominator does not appear to have any interest in actually improving wikipedia, just angling for the deletion of one of our 3.25 million articles.--Milowent (talk) 03:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I wonder whats your economic interest in this brewery to allow this bold face, unpaid ad to exist on wikpeidia?Beer and wine (talk) 04:50, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator note This article is boldly in conflict with Wikipedia policy. The issue of WP:PROMOTION and WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:NOT Notability are self evident. I wonder what the articles advertising dollar worth, being go glowingly featured in 4th place google search on beer. WP:ARTSPAM is absolutely obvious here as well as who primarily benefit from this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beer and wine (talk • contribs) 04:47, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.