Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twinsun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twinsun

Topic lacks significant coverage in reliable third-party sources and thus fails WP:V and WP:N. No significant coverage can be found, and so this article should be deleted. Randomran (talk) 15:51, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. Randomran (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Without establishing notability, it does not need to exist. TTN (talk) 15:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - There doesn't seem to be anything worth saving on this page.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 23:56, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A planet from a fictional universe with no references outside said universe to prove notability. VG ☎ 15:50, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as significant and notable enough for a paperless encyclopedia.--63.3.1.130 (talk) 17:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: WP:JUSTAPOLICY isn't enough. You need actual evidence of notability. Randomran (talk) 21:38, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.