Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twice as Nice production discography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Twice as Nice production discography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article for this production team has been deleted, so this should follow as suggested or predicted. DBrown SPS (talk) 18:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Twice as Nice was deleted per the deletion discussion here, so there's no need for a discography of productions for a company that has been determined to be non-notable. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Northamerica1000 DarjeelingTea (talk) 18:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Editors. I created this article after reading and editing the recently deleted Twice As Nice page. Though the discography may not take notability from the group 'Twice As Nice', can it not be made notable by the multiple tracks listed which are considered notable in their own right? Is there anything I can do to improve or save the article? Thanks (Haydon.h. (talk) 05:48, 18 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]
Delete - Nothing can be done to justify an article which is a discography from a non-notable production company. Exemplo347 (talk) 00:12, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per Northamerica1000 comment.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.