Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twenty Ten Music
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tim Song (talk) 13:28, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Twenty Ten Music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This music publishing house was, by its terms, created in 2010 and has quite a few social media sites, but Google News search has 0 listings (if you put it in quotes to find the actual phrase) "Twenty Ten Music".
As for google normal search, there are a few non-primary social networking sites and as a byline on a few ringtone and commercial sites, but nothing that would indicate notability. Shadowjams (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 18:00, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG for now. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Page has been expanded with new content and citations highlighting notability. Thank you for being prompt in calling my attention to the additions needed on this page. (It is indeed the first Wiki page I've created from scratch.) Per your feedback, I corrected the company's founding date, added notable credentials pertaining to its founder (Grammy-winning producer, discovered multi-platinum-selling rock act Switchfoot, etc.) along with citations, and also added a "Current Projects" section (also with citations) documenting the company's impact on the national scene in television, motion pictures and music distribution. I also added notable citations for several of the artists who have already signed publishing deals with the company.Jay Swartzendruber (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I appreciate the work--it's much improved. My lingering concern is that of all the non-primary source references I looked at, I never found the phrase "Twenty Ten Music" in any of them. Are there any that indicate some coverage of the company that I missed? Shadowjams (talk) 03:01, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 05:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]- That's a good question, Shadowjams. While many of the artists the company's signed to publishing deals have already received prominent national coverage, as have the company's initial recording projects, the company itself seems yet to be profiled at length in a major online outlet. This is no doubt due to the company being in its first year of existence. That said, I would propose the notable prestige of the company's founder/overseer combined with the company's immediate successes and ability to sign notable artists (as highlighted with citations) attests to its significance and increasing importance in the worlds of music, film and television. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jay Swartzendruber (talk • contribs) 15:53, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 02:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep due to notabiliy of founder and signed artists. Jim Heaphy (talk) 03:32, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I would change my nom !vote if someone would add some sources. The references in there, that are independent, don't really talk about the label (when I checked; if they're updated, tell me). Shadowjams (talk) 07:35, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Notability is not inherited. Joe Chill (talk) 17:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources such as Rhapsody, Amazon, etc., highlight Twenty Ten Music in the "Record Label" category for the recent To Save A Life Official Movie Soundtrack. With this in mind, I added Rhapsody as a new source to the Twenty Ten Music page. Does this effectively affirm notability?Jay Swartzendruber (talk) 15:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.