Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twelve noon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 22:12, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Twelve noon[edit]

Unreleased independent film. No sources, or claim to notability. — Twinzor ^{Say hi!} 19:55, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:NFF; nothing on IMDb. There is a film called "Twelve Noon Sharp" said to be "in development", but no detail, certainly not enough for an article, even if that is what is meant. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If nothing else, WP:CRYSTAL applies. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 20:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete A7, no assertion of notability. Also CRYSTAL, as above.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Films can't be speedied. Schuym1 (talk) 01:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. GregorB (talk) 21:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:NFF. Schuym1 (talk) 01:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The article is clearly not notable upon verification.--Ped Admi (talk) 04:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 22:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.