Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tutor Systems

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 06:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tutor Systems[edit]

Tutor Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable product which fails WP:NCORP and WP:NOTADVERTISING. Article reads like an ad. Kb.au (talk) 15:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Kb.au (talk) 15:53, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I am a little surprised by the request for deletion. It may also be due to a misunderstanding (as most sources are in German - I do not know, if Kb.au speaks this language). The applicant has copied links to possible sources. In this regard, I would like to comment on the sources already listed in the article. These are often in German or French. The reason for this is that Tutor System is a German invention and is known in 18 different language regions under different names. It is therefore somewhat coincidental that a publication has been published under this name. In addition, VeriTech (France, Franco-Canada) and TutorSystems (Australia, New Zealand) are terms that are also frequently used in other scientific environments. These are far higher demands than an advertisement.
Six articles are listed in the Literature section. Two are from teacher magazines (Schulpraxis, Lurelu), one is an article in a scientific journal (Biochemical Education), two are publications from the university sector (Cologne, Solingen).
In addition, a tutor-system-box with an accompanying textbook is listed in the collection of the Greensborough Historical Society and as such in the Museums Collections Database of Victoria (Victorian Collections). This is another indication of relevance. --Eruedin (talk) 20:27, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Some other litterature (3x academic, including 1x per reviewed) that gives examples about how to use TutorSystems in primary or secondary education:
  • Prof. Dr. Leopold Mathelitsch, Renate Bindar: Spielerisch lernen im Physikunterricht. in: Universitätslehrgang „Pädagogik und Fachdidaktik“ Naturwissenschaften. University of Klagenfurt, Institute for Teaching and School Development, Klagenfurt, 2011.
  • Alice Vorstandlechner: Mineralogische Themen in der Montessori-Pädagogik. University of Vienna, Vienna, 2008.
  • Cohen, Davene: CAPIT Toy Catalog. Rural Education Programm, Northwest Regional Education Laboratory, Portland (Oregon), 1975.
  • Joan Yares Schussheim: An Annotated Math Lab Inventory. in: School Science and Mathematics, v80 n6 p513-21 Oct 1980. --Eruedin (talk) 21:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:10, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep multiple independent references with international coverage. Sufficient WP:NEXIST to pass WP:GNG. Aoziwe (talk) 13:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tutor_Systems&oldid=1071411475"