Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tushar Pillay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 18:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tushar Pillay[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are several issues with this article.

The article has no meaningful, substantive content or nobility to qualify for WP:ANYBIO. Trivial mention in local tabloids is the basis of this article. It is merely a blatant promotion and misuse of Wikipedia.
WP:HOAX. The article made up of incorrect and misleading information including the wrong attributions. For example, some local records touted as Guinness World Records. However, merely holding Guinness or other records doesn't qualify WP:ANYBIO.
Unreliable sources and whitewashing using unaccreditated qualification. For example, World Records Univerity is a fraudulent organisation. It's a diploma mill operates from Faridabad, India. No such university in London or in the UK. https://www.gov.uk/check-a-university-is-officially-recognised/recognised-bodies.

Also to note, creator of the page been removing deletion and other tags from the page without any discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 10:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 11:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User:RationalPuff is making baseless accusations here. I did not remove any deletion tags or other tags. Check the page history. I only reverted his disruptive edits [[1]] and [[2]].

He maintains that "World Record University" mentioned in the page is not existing. But that's not true. Here's the website https://worldrecordsuniversity.co.uk/

Besides, User:RationalPuff had continued to make disruptive edits on this page including adding speedy deletion tags when admins like User:Espresso Addict and User:Liz had declined the speedy. This is quite disheartening.

There are clear evidence that the content of this page is factual and supported with sources. WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV are met here. That has been the reason the two admins declined the Speedy deletion for a record of two times.Papani i t.d. (talk) 18:42, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is not the Guiness Book of Worldrecords. It is time we purge articles on people with just plain silly "world records".John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:53, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He's made a flip book. Delete per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. While I declined the initial speedy requests on this as not quite meeting the A7/G11 thresholds, and there appears to be some reasonably reliable news coverage of the subject's achievements, I agree that the claims are far from meeting the encyclopedia's notability threshold. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:08, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - highly likely WP:UPE spam; creator blocked for spamming. MER-C 15:47, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - promotional article on someone not shown to meet WP:BASIC Spiderone 00:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.