Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turn Red

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to M Dot R. Daniel (talk) 03:00, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Turn Red[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, and likely WP:NMUSIC as well. Eternal Shadow Talk 04:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Eternal Shadow Talk 04:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unlike nom says, the song passes WP:NMUSIC. A sufficient requirement is for any song to have "been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts". It has ranked 59 on Sverigetopplistan, which is not a WP:BADCHART. बिनोद थारू (talk) 05:05, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:NSINGLE: Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts: Note again that this indicates only that a song maybe notable, not that it is notable.

There has also been nothing that shows that the song passes WP:GNG, which supersedes WP:NMUSIC regardless. Eternal Shadow Talk 05:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: One low chart placement alone would not cut it for NMUSIC if you ask me, and this song shows no other signs of notability that I could see. The only other coverage I could find was a page on the artist on Know Your Meme, and we don't regard that as a reliable source anyway. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 06:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "low chart"? WP:NSONG never said any of such but that it may be notable if it charted, probably if there's WP:SIGCOV and/or enough news coverage, or a certificate and award/nomination. dxneo (talk) 11:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway redirect to M Dot R, and it peaked at 69 not 59. Nothing in RS whatsoever. dxneo (talk) 12:39, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dxneo Low on the chart, as in not even in the top half and only for one week. A lot of songs can achieve that, but that doesn't mean it's an impressive or even notable chart run. Whether NSONG says anything about it or not, I still stand by it personally. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 22:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

QuietHere, unfortunately "personally" is not enough and does not override the WP:NSONG requirements. However, I doubt the article will see the light of the day, and I don't know why you voted del while there's a target page. dxneo (talk) 01:10, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to M Dot R since the single and chart info can be placed in the artist's Discography section. बिनोद थारू (talk) 02:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to M Dot R. Not notable. Darling ☔ (talk · contribs) 14:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with M Dot R: Not notable per QuietHere, but chart info can be merged per बिनोद थारू. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.