Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turn Around (Film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:12, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Turn Around (Film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable short film lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 01:38, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep--SeniorStar (talk) 01:44, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -Based on what? This is a short film that lacks independent, verifable references. Where is the in-depth coverage or coverage period? reddogsix (talk) 01:55, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Films notable enough for IMDb should be considered. Wikipedia offers an easily readable, easily navigable, easily searchable common ground for viewers to find information about this short film. Tooury101 (talk) 01:48, 3 December 2016 (UTC)tooury101[reply]

Comment - Please see WP:RS/IMDB concerning the use of IMDB as a reference. The purpose of Wikipedia is not to priovide a web presence for all movies. reddogsix (talk) 01:58, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - IMDb article read and understood. If I updated the reference to http://www.lostefilms.com/turn-around, would it be acceptable? Tooury101 (talk) 02:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)tooury101[reply]

Comment - This is just a listing of the credits and is not even close to in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 02:13, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Fair enough. Delete! Tooury101 (talk) 02:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)tooury101[reply]

Delete per WP:NFF. This film has apparently not been released yet, and no indication has been given as to how or where the film will be released. Nor have any sources been cited other than the film's own IMDb page, which is not a proof of notability, although it might be considered a prerequisite to establish a film's notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFF. IMDB page is not enough...Rameshnta909 (talk) 20:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.