Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turgon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:27, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Turgon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded for reason "seems notable enough". The article is only sourced to the Silmarillion and Children of Hurin and I can't find much in the way of actual coverage for this fellow. Since no coverage has popped up between my research before the prod and now, I'm taking Turgon to AfD. Hog Farm (talk) 02:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Minor character in minor works.--Jack Upland (talk) 04:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Tolkien trivia, fails WP:GNG/WP:NFICTION. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:22, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If only these editors were devoted to improving representation, rather than obsessively creating and maintaining fancruft. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 12:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete His sword may have been notable, but he is not. In part because when his sword is found in later times, he is not named as its former owner.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge a little to List of Middle-earth characters. He is, after all, a major character in The Silmarillion. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The usual Tolkien fancruft with nothing but primary sources. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:16, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.