Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuomo Town

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 01:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tuomo Town[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:GEOLAND and WP:GNG. The article presents only one source of questionable reliability and no clear claim of notability. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GEOLAND/ MarnetteD|Talk 14:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The article is poorly written, but this village/town is verifiable and better sources exist ([1] [2] to name just a couple). Searching for Tuomo Delta Nigeria is much more productive then Tuomo Town. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it is a town. --do ncr am 10:45, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:56, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It's a populated town or village; it's verifiable. Yes, the article could do with a bit of polish, but there is nothing that makes a rural Nigerian village inherently less notable than a rural British or Canadian or US village. Bad-patches (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Towns satisfy WP:GEOLAND. Also, AFD is not cleanup. Smartyllama (talk) 16:28, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.