Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tunedly.com

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be draftified or userfied via WP:REFUND (not by me). Sandstein 10:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tunedly.com[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Tunedly.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional page with no evidence of notability. The few cited sources that are actually about the company are not substantial coverage (JamSphere and Tech.co both only point to the company's existence and their coverage may not be independent). The page was moved from the draft namespace by the author citing the AfC help desk, but the only discussion of the article there is Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_November_16#07:59:20,_16_November_2020_review_of_draft_by_Yiyeant which does not indicate approval. FalconK (talk) 09:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 09:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. FalconK (talk) 09:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 17:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify. Not ready for prime time. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 02:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. FalconK's nomination says "Promotional page with no evidence of notability", and that just about sums it up. Contrary to what Whiteguru and the IP editor have said, neither the sources cited in the article nor the links given by the IP editor go anywhere towards showing notability. They include a lot of pages with just brief mentions of Tunedly, mere announcements of appointments or other business moves, unambiguously promotional or otherwise non-independent sources, and so on. Most of them don't even look remotely like substantial coverage in reliable independent sources, and the few that at first glance look as though they may be, turn out on closer examination not to be. (For example, looking one of them which at first looked as though it might be useful I found that half way down the page it referred to Tunedly as "we". I then discovered other reasons why it wasn't an acceptable source.)
There is clearly consensus that the page should not remain as an article, and the only point open to question is whether it should be draftified or simply deleted. Draftification is fine for an article that has too many faults to be acceptable as an article in its present state but is on a notable topic, but here we are dealing with a topic with no evidence of notability, so there is no justification for draftifying the article. JBW (talk) 17:07, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify per above. Needs some work, but I can see this being an article. jp×g 06:17, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as UPE spam. Blablubbs|talk 15:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tunedly.com&oldid=1002213743"