Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tune Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley 00:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tune Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

hardly sourced article that looks like an advertisement The Banner _talk 15:36, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added various references to the article. Obviously the text (and sourcing) can be expanded but the company appears notable. AllyD (talk) 19:13, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment while this should not be taken as supporting removal, I did not see anything approaching depth in the cited sources. As we look at references, I wonder if this "Closely-held" company has sufficient detail in its public coverage to support this article. Celtechm (talk) 17:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 04:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley Huntley (public) _talk 00:17, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the rational thing to do would be to merge the articles on the individual companies in here, not remove the article on the main organization. DGG ( talk ) 02:27, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve, and merge stub articles on the smaller individual companies here per DGG. References from WP:RS are now adequate. Altered Walter (talk) 09:01, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm surprised how little coverage there appears to be for Tune Group, considering how some of their companies are well-known (like Tune Hotels), plus they sponsor Caterham F1 (I think). Still, there are enough sources in the article to establish notability. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Improve - the question for inclusion/deletion is notability, where as something that looks like an advert should be tagged as approriate. More than notable enough to pass inclusion, over written presently with few references. Personally, a poor nomination for deletion. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 22:35, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.