Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tumour initiation factors
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY DELETE as complete nonsense. JIP | Talk 04:52, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tumour initiation factors (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete barely enough context to realize the topic, but without references such an article, if it could be written, doesn't begin with this... Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as unintelligible nonsense. Initiation factors aren't genes, either, so even the title is wrong, and there's so little to go on that who can tell what was intended? I think this one can be safely speedied. --Blechnic (talk) 01:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete The article is a nonsense. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (non-speedy, as no CSD applies): there's nothing worth keeping here. The single sentence is pretty obviously wrong - a "tumour supressor gene" doesn't sound like a "tumour initiation factor" to me. Quite the opposite, in fact. Zetawoof(ζ) 03:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, "complete nonsense" is a criterion for deletion. --Blechnic (talk) 03:15, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete G1 or A1 Article is pure word salad and incoherent. --Mizu onna sango15 Public (talk) 03:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.