Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tulia (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy and delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tulia (film)

Explicitly fails future films notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when the shooting can be reliably sourced to have already begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 22:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination on notability and WP:NOTCRYSTAL as the film is not even in production. AlbinoFerret (talk) 23:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:NFF. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article creator comment while the shooting of the film has not yet been started, it is almost certain that this film will come out eventually and its content/plot is already known. Halle Berry's pregnancy and its relation to the making of this film is also a notable story. Because racism/politics are involved, it will incite some considerable reaction. There is nothing wrong to prepare an article for such a film. Chimeric Glider (talk) 01:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NOTCRYSTAL, at this point it doesn't look as if the creation of this film is a sure thing --T-rex 02:50, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:NFF ukexpat (talk) 02:59, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy Chimeric Glider, you can request that the article be userfied to your user space where it can be edited and copied back to article space once filming is confirmed by reliable sources. I know it doesn't seem to make sense to delete it since it'll probably get made, but that's policy's current threshold. Berry's pregnancy makes an interesting side note to the article, but it doesn't confer exceptional publicity and thus notability to the film before filming even begins. Toliar (talk) 03:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I guess the rule must be upheld, so I am going to put this in a user subpage and put it up when it meets the rule's criteria of inclusion. Regards. Chimeric Glider (talk) 03:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied. Chimeric Glider (talk) 03:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.