Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tufyal Choudhury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 01:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tufyal Choudhury[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

contested Prod .Fails WP:PROF and WP:GNG Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:53, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Currently uncertain as the only actually convincing things are the over 1,000 library holdings and also his citations at a national level, there's nothing else convincing but I may consider keep because of these findings. Notifying DGG for analysis. SwisterTwister talk 04:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Almost all his books are coauthored by a group, of which he is a member. He;'s not listed as the senior author for any of them. He has only one independent book, Muslims in the UK : policies for engaged citizens, which is in only 103 libraries. DGG ( talk ) 16:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:58, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 23:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 23:18, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:Too soon. A GS h-index of 9 is not enough yet, but maybe in the future..... Xxanthippe (talk) 00:06, 8 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.