Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuba Dokur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tuba Dokur

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod, fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:57, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:57, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:57, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:57, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails NHOCKEY and GNG. No evidence of significant coverage and, correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not seeing anything in the article that is not WP:PRIMARY. Fenix down (talk) 07:20, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Another in a depressingly large number of NN Turkish hockey players that both fail NHOCKEY and the GNG (and that will no doubt see the usual suspects toss in the usual spate of namedrops and trivial mentions, and allege that those meet the GNG). Ravenswing 09:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Well, I hope I'm not a "ususal suspect" (c'mon, how ABF can that get?). Fails the GNG. All I see is listing mentions, nothing directly about. L3X1 (distænt write) 13:57, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.