Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truth Engineering
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty■ 05:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PROD tag removed by author, who then made the page a redirect to Knowledge-Based Engineering (by the way, redirects to article sections do not work), "not implying equivalence, rather it denotes a particular domain mapping". In any case, the term is a neologism/protologism not in wide use (a tiny handful of actual Google hits, most of which point to the author's web page [1]), apparently made up by the author. To the extent there's an article at all, it's definitely original research. The redirect to Knowledge-Based Engineering is inappropriate; delete. MCB 02:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete i have never heard of this thing; agree with above Perle 02:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note:User's 7th edit to Wikipedia, has 0 edits to mainspace. --kingboyk 02:57, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per nom Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 02:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. Chairman S. Talk 02:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn neologism. dbtfztalk 03:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as linkspam and per nom. Slowmover 05:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Deleteper nom Bucketsofg 05:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 07:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, someone tries to establish new term here. Pavel Vozenilek 13:52, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. —Eternal Equinox | talk 13:59, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, trying to set up a new buzzword. No other verifiable sources. Kuru talk 14:02, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 16:09, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. nonsense -- getcrunkjuicecontribs 17:32, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Khoikhoi 01:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.