Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truly Responsive Web Design

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that there is insufficient coverage to establish WP:N. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Truly Responsive Web Design[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are some pages, but I didn't find any deep research or definition of this. Most references are part of Responsive Web Design articles. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 10:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ran some searches, this doesn't seem to be an actual term. The term is "Responsive Web Design", truly is added in he everyday sense of usage, but "Truly Responsive Web Design" it's not a distinct concept that has been written about. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete One GScholar hit == not a term-of-art. Mangoe (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- unsourced original research and may not even exist. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.