Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truenose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Truenose[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All of the sources are from early/mid April this year. They all read like press releases, which can't be used for notability, and none are independent coverage of the subject. Company fails WP:NCORP. ~Styyx^Talk? 22:16, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United States of America. ~Styyx^Talk? 22:16, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No genuine third party coverage.-KH-1 (talk) 01:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom lacks third party coverage fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.