Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/True Children
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge. seresin ( ¡? ) 00:37, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- True Children (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is Unification Church jargon for Rev. Moon's children. If they are notable they should have articles under their own names. If not they should be mentioned in their father's article. Northwestgnome (talk) 14:25, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no reliable third party sources, so does not meet WP:NOTE. HrafnTalkStalk 16:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is already an article on the Moon family, True Family which has much more information. No need for this article too. On the question of in how much detail WP should cover Rev. and Mrs. Moon's family I will remain neutral since I am a UC member. Steve Dufour (talk) 16:42, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - repeats information from other articles. -Exucmember (talk) 19:57, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or redirect to True_Family#The_True_Children. No need to duplicate this information, but it could have value as a search term.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:17, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect: agree with Fabrictramp - leave redirect (valuable as a search term - key idea in Unificationism) -Exucmember (talk) 20:48, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Redirect to True_Family#The_True_Children. Redirects are cheap. Merge whatever non-redundant information into that article. --Dragon695 (talk) 01:54, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.