Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TrueTransparency

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vista Transformation Pack. redirecting based on statement that data already in article Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:51, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TrueTransparency

This article claims no notability for its subject--what appears to be a nice product--nor (based on my inspection of the first several pages of hits generated by a Google search) would there appear to be any obvious support for such a claim. Stub-class articles need to assert notability. Bongo matic 06:35, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Vista Transformation Pack. Doesn't have notability on it's own. --Kickstart70TC 07:19, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The info is already in the Vista Transformation Pack article.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 15:03, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then we can redirect and be done. (It's still a valid search term) - Mgm|^(talk) 16:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or redirect to Vista Transformation Pack SF007 (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the Vista Transformation Package article. HK22 ^{Talk to me!} 05:08, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.