Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trude Hancock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. I chose not to merge or redirect since the name "Trude Hancock" is unconfirmed. However, I will retarget the current redirect page Trude to List of Kath & Kim (Australian TV series) characters. --MelanieN (talk) 00:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trude Hancock[edit]

Trude Hancock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See Below Adpete (talk) 09:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adpete (talk) 09:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Adpete (talk) 23:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Adpete (talk) 23:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No redirect - Unless there is evidence that "Hancock" is the character's surname (and none has been provided), it should be a delete not a redirect. p.s. the surname was added in this edit [1] but no reason was offered. Adpete (talk) 04:58, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Before December 2014 the article was simply called Trude. That could redirect either List of Kath & Kim (Australian TV series) characters or to Trudy (disambiguation). Adpete (talk) 06:07, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:28, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 18:24, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I was just about to redirect when I saw above, I can't find any thing at all to say Hancock is his/her/ surname so seems a wiser choice to delete. –Davey2010Talk 02:17, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.