Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tritype

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:54, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tritype

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not have reliable sources. It was previously redirected for this reason, and "fixed" with the note that a redirect is not appropriate as the idea is separate. A variety of sources are used, but boil down to papers published by the idea's originator, conference proceedings, and two blog posts. A Google search does not throw up any other reliable sources that are not linked to the originator. I have seen no evidence of WP:RS. I do not believe this is notable WP:N. Raspberrypirate (talk) 23:14, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- The article is fiercely promotional of Katherine Fauvre. The Enneagram has plenty of citations in Google Scholar, Fauvre is mentioned in none of them. Enneagram_of_Personality has a well-referenced article. I suggest TNT for this article. If an interested editor wants to create from scratch, that would be great. Rhadow (talk) 15:48, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. —Paleo Neonate – 23:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question is there anything here that would be suitable to merge? DGG ( talk ) 01:45, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oh, and by the way, the title is a trademark. Rhadow (talk) 02:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:57, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Appears to be promotion while we already have a more general Enneagram of Personality article. —Paleo Neonate – 05:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.