Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trisha Silvers (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trisha Silvers[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIORELATED. Lettler^hello 21:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lettler^hello 21:30, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:47, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment How is WP:BIORELATED relevant? She's famous for surviving a natural disaster, her work with a foundation, and for receiving a national award. Being (briefly) married to an athlete doesn't preclude individual notability. pburka (talk) 11:50, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per everyone who participated in the 2014 discussion. pburka (talk) 22:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: no less notable than when she passed previous AfD: the fact that there's a navbox template for {{Young Australians of the Year}} suggests that it confers notability, and there's ongoing coverage. PamD 11:45, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: the discussion from the 2014 AfD is still valid, she's still notable as Young Australian of the Year and her other work. --Krelnik (talk) 18:21, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.