Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triplebyte
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:19, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Triplebyte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Still borderline if at all, at best, my searches and examinations have found sources but it's still all both advertorial and minimal still; my searches simply found mere mentions, like what I'm saying at Harjeet Taggar's AfD. "Companies that have used" is clearly not quite acceptable as it only suggests what likely clients would want to know and all of this suggests, at best, it's at funding accumulation stages, and that's not surprising for a barely 1-year-old company. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:49, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Plausible sources not there. WP:Too soon . Xxanthippe (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC).
- Delete. not notable, and apparently promotional . DGG ( talk ) 08:16, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.