Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tripartite motto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete with redirect to hendiatris Gnan garra 01:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tripartite motto[edit]

All google hits are Wikipedia mirrors. The article failed to explain (to me) what it even is! Giggy _U^CP 04:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEO - ". To support the use of (or an article about) a particular term we must cite reliable secondary sources such as books and papers about the term—not books and papers that use the term" - Article fails to establish any secondary sources, so its WP:OR Corpx 04:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO. The lack of verifiablity is also a concern here. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 06:34, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to hendiatris. There are some in-passing Google Books returns, but it doesn't seem to really be a defined phrase, just one that has been (possibly independently) used descriptively. To that end, most of the article is synthesis. --Dhartung | Talk 07:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, because it concerns factual, familiar, famous phrases, but I agree that sources should be added. --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 15:57, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Should probably be merged somewhere, and google isn't very helpful with this one, but I don't think it should be deleted outright because of that. Give it a chance for references to be added or for it to find a new home in another article. —Xezbeth 08:34, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep merge with something (hendiatris? motto?), as xezbeth xez.--Victor falk 15:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.