Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trip rock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 18:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trip rock[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources given (in fact no sources at all). No evidence of notability. SabreBD (talk) 14:26, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Besides lacking sources, the article does not make a clear declaration about the meaning of the two word expression.Borock (talk) 16:11, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep' Discogs and Last FM list bands as trip-rock. Anarchangel (talk) 04:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Those are not reliable sources. You need to find a reliable source that uses the term. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - I contradict your assertion. Those are reliable sources. You may prefer AllFail, but I find it to be all flash and no substance; a source that is routinely incomplete and makes mistakes under cover of slick graphics for quick profits, while other sites do thorough and reliable work for a steady living. Wikipedians often confuse AllFail's incompleteness with exclusivity, and exclusivity with discretion. It is purely incompetence. You may also restore the sources if you wish. Anarchangel (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Last.FM is blatantly not a reliable source. Its content is almost entirely user-submitted. — Gwalla | Talk 18:08, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Neither is Discogs. Content is user edited and then voted on. Reliable sources include peer edited books and articles and not user generated websites. See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_48#Discogs and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 57#last fm for previous discussions.--SabreBD (talk) 19:45, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Use is restricted to user-generated, unreliable sources. Does not seem to be an accepted genre in reliable sourced. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing notable here, no reliable references.Jacona (talk) 01:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.