Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trick Flow Specialties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trick Flow Specialties

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company does not appear to be notable to me, and the article seems to be a puff piece. Tazerdadog (talk) 06:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 28. Snotbot t • c » 01:45, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. This business makes engine parts for US domestic cars. Google News finds only a handful of press releases and notices of local sponsorships and the like. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:20, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 09:01, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient coverage to pass guidelines of WP:CORP. Stubbleboy 14:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.