Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tricia Jenkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:08, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tricia Jenkins

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC, most of the sources are primary. Only CIA propaganda has raised some controversy but really there is nothing notable for her. No prestigious academic award, nor she is elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association. Meeanaya (talk) 04:21, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Most of the sources are about brief mentions and really lacks in-depth RS to establish her authority. Meeanaya (talk) 04:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. J 947 ^{^{^(c)}}, at 04:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 11:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete or redirect. Her work on the CIA appears to be notable but should be focused on the book not on her per WP:BIO1E. Beyond that, her publications appear to be only journal papers (well received but not heavily enough cited to convince me of a pass of WP:PROF#C1) and edited volumes (much less strong than well-reviewed books as evidence towards WP:AUTHOR). —David Eppstein (talk) 05:09, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is this a case where the book is more wiki-notable than the author? It sort of has that feel. XOR'easter (talk) 15:47, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The refs don't support notability of the subject. It could possibly be draftified and turned into an article about the book and sent to AfC. Szzuk (talk) 15:45, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.