Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribelands of Haradwaith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Harad. Nishkid 64 02:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tribelands of Haradwaith[edit]

The names Kârna, Badharkân, Dalamyr, Hidâr, Nâfarat, Dhâran-sar, Abrakân, and Gadîrkarn are not from Tolkien's works. For actual stuff he wrote about this see Harad and Haradrim. Google searches show that they apparently come from wargaming (The Lord of the Rings Strategy Battle Game?) or other games, and thus are just forms of fan fiction (I have nothing against it myself, but just don't think it's canonical). Delete article, and possibly merge info with relevant articles. Uthanc 00:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Harad if cited, Delete otherwise. We have the ICE names of the Nazgûl in the main article - I suspect these are ICE names as well. Tevildo 03:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Delete I believe that some items may be merged with the article on Harad, but the non-canonical items should be either noted as such or deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roaddawg (talk • contribs) 05:06, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Delete per above, particularly as this does not appear to come from Tolkien to begin with.--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 05:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 10:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with whatever book it appears in. Too narrow scope to have its own article. No context - I actually thought it was real until I read the article and saw the stub type. JIP | Talk 15:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Merge into The Lord of the Rings Strategy Battle Game and/or Harad where appropriate. Uthanc's assumptions are correct: they form part of the Games Workshop wargaming products, and are not canonical. More to the point, the context is not large enough to warrant its own article. --Grimhelm 17:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge where appropriate. Probably the strategy game unless someone can find a reference in one of Tolkien's writings. Irongargoyle 18:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.