Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribe FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Willunga, South Australia#Media. Since it's already been merged, I guess. Sandstein 11:12, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tribe FM[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a radio station, not properly sourced as meeting WP:NMEDIA. While this certainly appears, as written, to be a licensed and fully operational station that creates some of its own original programming, there's a fourth condition that radio stations also have to meet to qualify for Wikipedia articles: its meeting of the other three criteria has to be verifiable in reliable sources that are fully independent of it. However, the only references here are its own self-published website about itself, and routine entries in the member directories of community radio organizations it's a member of. No matter what a radio station claims about itself, the notability test still requires some evidence of media coverage about it. Bearcat (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! ^{Babymissfortune} 17:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays~! ^{Babymissfortune} 17:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I didn't catch that requirement when I read through it. Anyway, delete as I cannot find independent, in-depth reliable sources verifying any of the criteria, failing WP:GNG and WP:V. Not to be confused with a Papua New Guinea station of the same name. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is this reference, which provides Government vetted statutory information about the organisation and hence goes some real way to providing core depth, and verifiability. There is also this not entirely independent reference but none-the-less most probably reliable reference providing some real depth. But I too cannot find any broad or sustained coverage (other than many routine directory listings). Aoziwe (talk) 11:55, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Willunga, South Australia#Media. Insufficient coverage to suppport notability in its own right, but sufficient for some due weight material in its home place article. (There is also this Government administrative reference). Aoziwe (talk) 12:14, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect ... I agree with the suggestion immediately above and have copied/edited content from this article, and placed it over at Willunga, South Australia. Thanks for making the suggestion. I haven't done the redirect, as I don't know how to... and thought it better to let this conversation play out first. --Danimations (talk) 03:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.